9 Comments
User's avatar
Ollie Parks's avatar

"Trans inclusivity" has become a rhetorical cudgel—a way to compel conformity rather than foster tolerance. The demand isn’t just to respect trans identities, but to accept them into categories where biological sex is essential, like same-sex attraction.

When gay men are told that rejecting a trans-identified female makes them bigoted, they’re being asked to deny the very basis of their sexuality. That’s not inclusion—it’s coercion masquerading as virtue.

Expand full comment
Cameron h petrie's avatar

Will we ever get to peak transanity?

Expand full comment
MLisa's avatar

Where I live there is a family that owns a small local business. The daughter went on T, set up a Go Fund Me for her mastectomy and is now a gay man who wants to date only gay men. It completely boggles my mind! I don't/won't purchase from their store because I don't want to stare and/or feel uncomfortable for participating in a lie.

Expand full comment
Ollie Parks's avatar

In a better world she'd be sectioned.

Expand full comment
NeverForget1776's avatar

Its insanity plain and simple. It is al about breaking normalcy so it can be rebuilt to be whatever the architect wants.

1) This is not organic by any means. There are those who stand to gain in either money and or power from this who are promoting it.

2) It is about tearing down reality so a new reality can be made, one where people are more easily controlled because they are confused and scared uncertain of anything

It is going to take the combination of real gays, men and women both, plus the heterosexual community to put an end to this non-sense before it's too late! This is part of a larger scheme to break society so it can be re-shaped into a more easily controlled and manipulated society. There is no other explanation that comes even close to making any sense as to why this is being done. And to be clear this is not to say there are no such thing as trans men or women as they did exist before this but they were the VERY few and they were as they are not because it was some fad but because it is how they actually felt!

We should no more support this then we would support those who suffer from bulimia. If you are a woman who is still attracted to the opposite sex then you are not a gay man trapped in a woman's body but an actual woman. Same goes for the other side. There are only 2 sexes and 3 possible sexual presences; same, opposite or bi. Anything else is delusion.

Expand full comment
Lida H's avatar

This is beyond abhorrent.

It actually makes me wonder if the mainstream media is going to dare to do something similar to lesbians for prime time. To paraphrase a YouTuber I follow - it'd probably seem even more heinous than attempting conversion therapy on gay men. Still: what's sauce for the goose...

Expand full comment
Anne Martinez's avatar

I think gay men aren't as up in arms because women claiming to be gay are by and large more of an annoyance than a threat, as compared to men claiming to be lesbians are to women.

Expand full comment
Anne Martinez's avatar

"Can we just take a minute to remember that all those times in pretty recent history when gay men were arrested, beaten, and killed, it wasn’t because people were soooo angry and disgusted about their love for Liza Minelli and ascots?! It was because of the things they did with each other’s bodies when they were naked." It's shocking how easily people have forgotten that the reason same-sex relationships were condemned by religious organizations and states from antiquity, to the extent that they were, was that the sex they had did not result in children, and did not result in population growth for said religion or state. Therefore, they were seen as deliberately shirking their duties.

Expand full comment
Ted's avatar

Using social pressure as a means of persuasion is nothing new. Where it crosses the line into the realm of the unacceptable, is when that social pressure is used to compel ideological conformity by means of legislation.

One contemplates the injection of behavioral science into this array of compulsory pressures, with a certain horrified fascination. To equate behavioral science with benevolence, is a category error.

There's a certain Kafkaesque quality to what appears to be nothing so much as a "Rocky Horror Picture Show meets George Orwell" paradigm.

Expand full comment